Democratic nominee for Virginia lieutenant governor Justin Fairfax challenged Republican rival state Sen. Jill Holtzman Vogel Wednesday over a invoice she launched in 2012 that would have pressured many in search of abortion care within the state to bear a transvaginal ultrasound.
The matter got here up throughout a lieutenant governor candidate discussion board in Charlottesville, Virginia, when Fairfax criticized Vogel for suggesting that “she wants to take government out of everyone’s life” although she had been the lead sponsor of what he characterised as an “invasive ultrasound bill.”
“I can’t think of a more intrusive thing that a government can do,” Fairfax stated.
Vogel countered that “there was nothing in that bill that took any rights away from women or forced them to do anything against their will.”
Appreciate our work?
Rewire is a non-profit unbiased media publication. Your tax-deductible contribution helps help our analysis, reporting, and evaluation.
Vogel’s invoice, SB 484, would have required these in search of an abortion to bear an ultrasound and have the choice of viewing it earlier than the process. It didn’t explicitly drive a affected person to bear a transvaginal ultrasound. However, as most abortions happen early in a being pregnant when a transvaginal ultrasound could also be only in figuring out gestational age, the invoice would have meant many would wish to bear one as an alternative of an stomach ultrasound to adjust to the regulation.
“It was simply an informed consent bill,” Vogel claimed, including that “partisan rhetoric around this bill is so offensive” and noting that she withdrew the invoice when she believed it had grow to be “a tool of partisanship.”
A “watered down” model of Vogel’s laws was later signed into regulation by then-Gov. Bob McDonnell (R).
“Women’s health issues should never be played that way,” Vogel stated on the discussion board. “I have been a hardcore advocate for women and women’s health.”
The ultrasound measure was not Vogel’s solely enterprise into anti-choice laws whereas within the state senate. During this yr’s main for the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor, Vogel argued in a February op-ed revealed in the conservative Bearing Drift that in “the almost ten years that I have served in Virginia’s Senate, I have maintained a 100 percent pro-life voting record—each and every year and have been in the front lines of attacks for my pro-life positions.”
When the U.S. Supreme Court dominated that some provisions of a Texas regulation regulating abortion suppliers have been unconstitutional and introduced an “undue burden” on individuals looking for abortion care, Vogel famous in a weblog submit that she had supported comparable abortion restrictions in her personal state. In the submit, revealed on her marketing campaign’s web site, Vogel pushed the false declare that the restrictions have been merely “commonsense safety standards.” She launched her personal measure for medically pointless focused regulation of abortion supplier (TRAP) legal guidelines in Virginia in 2009.
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer wrote of the provisions struck down within the Court’s determination that “when directly asked at oral argument whether Texas knew of a single instance in which the new requirement would have helped even one woman obtain better treatment, Texas admitted that there was no evidence in the record of such a case.”
Fairfax has served as a board member for Planned Parenthood Metro Washington Action Fund. He has been endorsed by NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia, citing his “100 percent score” on its candidate questionnaire.